#aerial attacks #Chasiv Yar #drone #Kupiansk #Kyiv #missile #Pokrovsk #Russia #Russian war in Ukraine #Sumy #Ukraine

Battles for the strategic city of Chasiv Yar

Ukraine denies reports that it has lost the important city of Chasiv Yar. Russians, on the other hand, claim that they have managed to occupy it after a 16-month bloody battle. According to Ukrainians, however, defenders remain in fortified positions in its western part. They are also under heavy pressure from the aggressors in another strategic city, Pokrovsk. Russian bombs were also killing in the inland areas.

The battle for the city of 12,000 began with the landing of Russian paratroopers last April. The vast majority of residents were replaced by Ukrainian soldiers, who fortified themselves in cellars and the ruins of buildings. However, the encounter turned into a cruel war of attrition, which turned the industrial settlement into ruins.

For 484 days already, the Russians have been showering Ukrainian positions with grenades, rockets, and suicide drones. Kyiv denies Moscow’s boastful reports that its forces have broken through on the extensive front and occupied the city. According to sources from Czech television, defenders are still holding out in its western part.

Another key city, Pokrovsk, is also falling. Fighting for it has been going on since last July. Here too, Ukrainians lack infantry. Massive Russian attacks with the help of drones often cover the often suicidal advance of small units. Where they manage to break through, the aggressors immediately deploy reinforcements and enlarge the breakthrough. The defenders then have no choice but to retreat.

Attacks on Ukrainian inland

Russians also attacked in the Ukrainian inland. Kyiv was hit in two waves:

▪️First, swarms of Russian drones circled over the city

▪️Then the Russian army fired missiles

In one of Kyiv’s districts, an Iskander missile destroyed part of a residential building.

Interview with Pavel Macko, former commander of the NATO Joint Forces Training Center

Moderator: Good evening to you.

Pavel Macko: Good evening.

Moderator: So if we first stop at those Russian air strikes on Ukrainian territory, they have been much more massive lately. What tactics do the Russians use in them and how does the Ukrainian air defense manage to respond?

Pavel Macko: Well, they are already combining those attacks, whether with missiles or drones. But they are already flying in with those drones from all directions. In this way, they are trying to saturate basically the entire air defense system. Meanwhile, they have also improved the design of those drones. And it’s harder for Ukrainians. They still had a 95% success rate last year. Now it’s about 79%. And against missiles, of course, they are gradually running out of those ground-to-air resources, and the effectiveness reaches about 50%. So this is actually the main way Russians are trying to break through that defense – to saturate it with the maximum number from all directions.

Moderator: When I turn it around, how successful is Ukraine in its air strikes on Russia, and can it match Russia in the production of unmanned machines, or missiles?

Pavel Macko: Ukraine is catching up in the production of these unmanned machines, and of course we are talking about different categories. Russians primarily threaten Ukraine with those Shahed clones, which they are now producing themselves. And Ukraine has made very significant progress, has greater reaches into the depths of Russian territory. Those strikes are increasingly effective and really inflict severe blows to that Russian infrastructure, but also to the Russian military-industrial complex. For example, strong Russian air defenses cannot prevent all these strikes. And additionally, Ukraine is also working on ballistic missiles and they almost have a range of up to 700 kilometers and is also working on its own cruise missiles derived from the Neptune missile.

Moderator: If we look at the front, we’ve already mentioned it, Ukraine today denied the Russian claim that the Russians captured the city of Chasiv Yar. What information do we have about what’s happening on the ground, and how important is this city?

Pavel Macko: This city is tactically significant. I know that it’s used in the media as a strategic target, but it’s a tactically significant place. Its possession or control could fundamentally influence the course of fighting in that immediate vicinity. Namely, it would increase pressure on Konstantinovka, and if that fell too, the Russians would open up space for a stronger attack into that northwestern part of the Donetsk region around Sloviansk and Kramatorsk.

It’s also an elevated city, where it’s advantageous tactical terrain for defense, because from it you can also control that surrounding area if the Russians tried to bypass Chasiv Yar. And it’s also advantageous for supporting a possible penetration into the depth of that territory. So it’s important to monitor it.

Ukrainians still hold positions there according to the latest information, but if they lost that city, the Russians would gain such a local tactical advantage. But basically they have to finish, and if they wanted success in that entire Donbas, they probably have to complete the operation in the area of Toretsk and Pokrovsk as well. Or then bet a lot of forces on one breakthrough. But that’s also risky in that they could get to advanced positions and then be subsequently under Ukrainian fire.

Moderator: You mentioned Pokrovsk, which lies about 60 kilometers south of Chasiv Yar. What is the situation there, how important a section of the front is it? Or, where are the key sections of the front now, where the Russians are pushing the most?

Pavel Macko: Let’s start with Pokrovsk. The Russians are trying to bypass Pokrovsk from the southwest, they are actually already beyond Pokrovsk, heading west and also on the northern side. They are using a similar tactic as they used at Vuhledar, that they don’t go for a direct attack on the city and don’t conquer it as at Toretsk, Kupiansk, or mainly at Chasiv Yar for 16 months, which is an extremely long time. So they try to bypass it and gradually isolate the city.

The same thing is happening in Toretsk, where Toretsk is still partially under Ukrainian control and Ukrainians are waging the most intense battles, besides these areas. Chasiv Yar, Pokrovsk, Toretsk. Precisely in the Kupiansk area, where the Russians are again attacking for more than a year and are trying to create a bridgehead and are bypassing that Kupiansk from the north. But they haven’t succeeded so far from the southern side, so they couldn’t surround it. Kupiansk is important because it’s an important hub for supplying Russian troops from that entire area from central or western Russia. At the same time, if the Russians wanted to contemplate any offensive into the Kharkiv region in the future, then they need that Kupiansk under control.

Moderator: Does anything suggest that the Russians might manage a more significant breakthrough in the foreseeable future?

Pavel Macko: Not yet. That Russian offensive is still expected, but it’s running de facto. The Russians are testing the strength of the Ukrainian defense in various places and are trying to break through it. But they haven’t created something that I would call operational reserves. That means at some depth distance from the combat line, that they would have some reserves that they could immediately deploy into that breakthrough, as the Ukrainians did in the case of that breakthrough almost three years ago, when they were attacking precisely in the Kharkiv region.

That means that the Russians will try to break through the defense somewhere. And then they will do the regrouping afterwards by taking from some part of the front and will transfer forces to that breakthrough point as quickly as possible. But that’s mostly by rail and it doesn’t mean that we could expect some massive breakthrough from day to day. Simply put, they will try for such tactical successes. But we see that conquering a city of 12,000 for 16 months is probably not something that could be called modern maneuver warfare.

Moderator: What price are the Russians paying for advancing on the front?

Pavel Macko: That price is enormous. For Chasiv Yar itself, it’s said that those losses could be approaching 10 thousand. Last year, for those 4 thousand square kilometers, the Russians paid with enormous losses. Those are wounded and fallen, not just fallen – 427 thousand soldiers. These losses at this pace are very high.

Ukrainians, although they have a smaller number of personnel, but still using drones and other measures, they manage to quite intensively destroy these Russian attacks. It means that the Russians continue at the cost of those massive waves, when they actually oversaturate that ground defense of Ukrainians, but those Russian losses are disproportionately high. They are high, but apparently it’s not some factor that would influence Russian decision-making.

Moderator: We’re talking about Russian pressure, but do Ukrainians have more initiative in some parts of the front?

Pavel Macko: It’s kind of alternating. Of course, overall, the Russians have the tactical initiative and at this moment also the operational initiative, which means they open those combat encounters. They decide where the attack is mostly happening. But Ukrainians repeatedly in that northern part near Pokrovsk, or in the western part near Chasiv Yar, they repeatedly pushed back even in the last few days.

Back to those Ukrainian units. We saw in the Sumy region that the Russians tried, after the Ukrainians withdrew from the Kursk region, they tried to push towards Sumy through the Sumy region. There, the Ukrainians pushed them back. The same thing happens continuously then at those other main points, whether at Toretsk, or also around Chasiv Yar. The city itself is of course now a gray zone, where they are actually fighting for control of the rest of that western part of the city.

Moderator: Says the former commander of the NATO Joint Forces Training Center Pavel Macko. Thank you very much for the interview. I wish you a nice day.

Pavel Macko: Thank you for the invitation. Have a nice evening.

Note: The original video in Czech and LSovak language you can see here:
https://youtu.be/QsOahqIJa6M?si=prFZA2B8HYRclOBD

The post How Long Will Russians Continue to Escalate Terror Against Civilians? appeared first on Pavel Macko - Bezpečnosť, Technológie, Stratégie.

#Attack on Kyiv #Kyiv #Putin #Russain war of agression #Russia #Trump #Trump’s ultimate #USA #War in Ukraine

We are discussing the military and political consequences of the current situation in Ukraine with General Pavel Macko.

Interview with General Pavel Macko

Host: Welcome to JOJ24 broadcast. Good evening. General, why did the Russians decide to launch such a massive attack at this particular time?

General Macko: The Russians are now cyclically conducting at least one major attack on Kyiv every week. This is happening in the middle of the summer fighting season, while there’s also some ultimatum running which they are downplaying, and despite this, they want to damage Ukrainian infrastructure to the maximum extent possible. They want to hit as many targets as possible and use such massive combined attacks for this purpose.

Today’s attack wasn’t exceptional in this regard, since it’s cyclical as I said – these records are being broken all the time. What could be emphasized, however, is that for the first time, the attack began with a massive drone assault from all directions on Kyiv. This was meant to saturate the air defense system, followed by the launching of cruise missiles Iskander-K.

These are similar to Iskander ballistic missiles, except these fly at a low altitude above the ground. They are very precise missiles with a standard accuracy of less than 5 meters. And since we see what they hit, it’s clear that this was a completely deliberate Russian strike on a civilian area, because apart from the apartment building that was destroyed, there were only other civilian objects all around. So any error or accident is ruled out. Simply put, they did it deliberately.

Russian military doctrine and destruction of civilian infrastructure

The reason is that while the Russians don’t formally have in their doctrines that they can violate the Geneva Conventions and attack civilian targets, they do have in their military doctrine the destruction of civilian infrastructure – whether transportation or energy. They use it as a tool to undermine will, as part of psychological warfare and also as a tool of political pressure.

The fact that it doesn’t work is another matter, but simply in that portfolio of options they have available, the Russians have used this too. This is also the case with the „Oreshnik“ on Dnipro, where it has a large dispersion – on the contrary, it cannot hit precisely – and is also meant to cause as much damage, chaos, and panic as possible in the middle of the city.

They are trying to indicate that they will continue the attacks, that they will escalate, and that Ukrainians should not rely on sanctions or secondary sanctions or international pressure. The only chance – this is Russia’s message – is for Ukrainians to surrender, comply with Russian terms, and maybe then the Russians will change their approach.

Host: In recent months, Russia has also been escalating attacks on Ukrainian cities and towns far behind the front line. Is this a Russian tactic and what is it aimed at?

General Macko: This is what I’ve already indicated. They’ve been doing this since the beginning of the conflict, but of course as Ukrainian air defense gradually weakens and as the Russians gradually find tactical approaches to make attacks more effective, they are precisely aiming to create panic and chaos throughout the country and, of course, weaken infrastructure.

Attempt to weaken the Ukrainian economy and defense industry

This is also an important aspect. Ukraine is increasingly producing defense equipment on its own. For this, of course, it needs energy, it needs factories. The military ones are mostly underground and are well protected from the Soviet era – Ukraine was like an armory of the Soviet Union. But of course there are supply chains, there are also regular factories.

As a result, the Russians are trying to disrupt this Ukrainian economy as much as possible, to „cut its veins“ so that the economy cannot generate as many defensive resources. This makes Ukraine less dependent on external supplies and less dependent on political decisions and cycles within those external supplies, as we have seen that supplies were repeatedly interrupted.

So this is also a key objective of Russia – if they attack somewhere in central or western Ukraine, they attack precisely with the aim of disrupting the functioning of the Ukrainian economy and especially the military-industrial complex to the maximum extent possible.

Host: Could Trump’s shortened ultimatum also have been a catalyst for the Russian attack? The Russians firmly rejected it. What do you think will be the reaction of the American administration?

Trump, sanctions and the US response

General Macko: I’ll start with a reflection on whether it was a reaction. The Russians have been systematically escalating these attacks, so it’s hard to say. It would be speculation if I said that now they are actually sending signals to Trump as well. They have been doing this systematically since the beginning of the year and have been doing it since Trump took power.

After rejecting a possible ceasefire and ceasefire offers in April, the Russians began to escalate the pressure. Thus, they are trying to do something about the conflict. They probably also have their own economic problems.

When it comes to President Trump’s ultimatum, he has to some extent fallen into the trap of his own statements. This means he will have to do something. He has now threatened secondary sanctions – that means sanctions on all countries that will buy from the Russians certain products that will be subject to sanctions, as the United States itself does not buy many of them.

Here’s the problem where, at least with China, it could end up that Trump will not be able to enforce this and China will continue to buy oil from Russia as well as gas. And if the Americans came with those sanctions, the chapter of tariff and trade war would open again.

Trump has also indicated a very tough stance toward India, where it at least appears that he could really impose secondary tariffs and that those negotiations could be very tough. India, despite having built better relations with the United States in recent years, trades very intensively not only in arms products but also in oil products with Russia. This, of course, undermines Donald Trump’s effort to force Russia to end the fighting and sit at the peace table.

Planned American support for Ukraine

But there is also another aspect – Donald Trump is apparently preparing the ground for a more radical announcement of further deliveries of weapons systems to Ukraine, including offensive weapons systems. There is currently a bill in Congress in the Senate that should allow a regular model of financing and supplying Ukrainian forces with American weapons through NATO allies, where at least $8 billion a year should go to this type of support.

Host: As you mentioned yourself, Ukraine is facing a summer offensive, during which Russian forces are making advances in areas that have been relatively spared since the beginning of the war. Moscow has announced that its troops have captured the city of Chasiv Yar, which was an important stronghold of the Ukrainian army in the east of the country. What might this mean for Ukraine’s negotiating positions and for the further development of the conflict?

The significance of the capture of Chasiv Yar and the situation at the front

General Macko: It doesn’t fundamentally change the situation yet, because the fighting for Chasiv Yar has been going on for 16 months, so the city is totally destroyed. We’re talking about a town the size of Holíč or Šamorín – a 12,000-person city that the Russians have been conquering for 16 months. The actual fighting for Chasiv Yar has been going on since the fall of Bakhmut in May 2023, which means more than two years, because the first phase was to get to the Donbas water canal, which was a kind of natural barrier on the border of Chasiv Yar. When the Russians overcame it, they spent another 16 months conquering the city.

The situation is similar in Kupiansk, where for more than a year the Russians have been trying to capture the city. It’s the same with Pokrovsk, in Toretsk – they are in the city, but the fighting for the city has also been going on for over a year.

This means that even if the Russians captured these cities, even if the capture of Chasiv Yar was confirmed, it would tactically give them an advantageous position. There is higher terrain there that provides a good view of the surrounding area. They could further attack Konstantinovka, and if they gained that too, they would open a gateway for a larger grouping of troops, which we don’t see anywhere yet. They would have to move it from somewhere, and then they could start attacking in the direction of Kramatorsk and Slavyansk.

Limits of Russian advance and negotiating positions

But even if they were successful in this, Russia’s negotiating position is that they still demand that Ukraine cede parts that have not been occupied so far, which they either never occupied at all, such as Slavyansk, Kramatorsk or Zaporizhzhia, or which they occupied temporarily, such as Kherson, from where they were pushed out.

This means that the negotiating position will not change in any fundamental way. The Russians would need a bigger breakthrough to occupy the rest of Donbas, but so far it doesn’t look like they have the capacity for that – unless the Ukrainians make some huge mistake. We don’t see any operational reserves, any larger grouping of troops that would be somewhere close to the front line and waiting to be deployed where the front line is broken through.

This means that even if the Russians break through the front line, they will more or less prioritize and take troops from some other parts of the front section and quickly strengthen the breakthrough area. But of course, this takes some time and also gives the Ukrainians time to regroup their forces.

Russian tactics and slow progress

The Russians are simply taking advantage of the fact that they have numerical superiority and that Ukrainians have a problem with personnel, which they compensate for with greater use of drones. The Russians are throwing all forces into battles, but progress is relatively slow. For larger cities, they are creating conditions for their encirclement and then gradual capture, but so far there is no sign of any dramatic speed in terms of advancing tens of kilometers a day.

Host: That was General Pavel Macko. Thank you for the interview and your time. Goodbye.

General Macko: Thank you for the invitation, have a pleasant evening.

Host: I will add to the viewers that you can also watch the entire interview on our website joj24.sk in the Studio JOJ24 section.

Videorecording of the interview you can see here:

https://youtu.be/r8Tzk3clOzg?si=lwRL_7fzxM-6AErE

See also:

Ukrainians and Russians are Learning. What About Us?

Ukrainian War for Existence – Pavel Macko – Bezpečnosť, Technológie, Stratégie

Analysis: Is a lasting and just peace within reach? – Pavel Macko – Bezpečnosť, Technológie, Stratégie

Trump sends nuclear submarines near Russia after Putin aide’s ‘dead hand‘ threat

The post Is Russia provoking President Trump? appeared first on Pavel Macko - Bezpečnosť, Technológie, Stratégie.