Russian reflexive control is in action once again #nuclear exercise#nuclear tests#reflexive control#Russia#Sarmat

Russians are not succeeding on the battlefield. Ukraine eliminated Russia’s first attempt at a summer offensive before it could properly begin. In the first four months, Ukrainians liberated more territory than Russians conquered – even Russian military bloggers admit this. Ukrainians eventually generously allowed Russians a limited military parade on May 9th. Even the most fortified city in the world, Moscow, cannot completely defend itself against Ukrainian drones. This is fully manifesting in these days. Massive slaughter of Ukrainian civilians and the destruction or damage of up to 50 residential buildings in a single day by Russian drones and ballistic missiles is not working. Ukraine continues to defend itself valiantly.
Suddenly, Russians are talking about peace negotiations, but they still set nonsensical and unrealistic conditions, such as demanding that Ukrainians surrender the entire Donbas. Russians have not conquered Donbas even after 12 years, or rather after more than 4 years of full-scale invasion supported by partial mobilization. Putin is preparing to go to Beijing. Trump no longer supports Putin’s demands regarding Donbas.
And so Russians are practicing nuclear war. Not because they actually intend to wage it – after all, they cannot even stop relatively simple Ukrainian drones and missiles, let alone launch a surprise nuclear attack on someone and protect themselves from a retaliatory strike. Russians do not have such capability. It is only about diverting attention, intimidating the West, providing arguments to false peacekeepers and Russian collaborators. The problem is that malicious tongues say that during not-so-distant Sarmat tests, one of them exploded even during launch. Sooner or later, incompetent and unreliable Russians will create a mess.
It is called reflexive management or reflexive control. They engage you and redirect your conscious and subconscious perception in such a way that it fundamentally influences your decision-making. You then make decisions in a way that suits the architect of the reflexive campaign. It is like a „Beware of vicious dog!“ sign on a fence that subconsciously deters you from even peeking over the fence. Yet during walks around, it is enough to listen whether there is ever actually any dog barking there.
NASPAŤ